Roig WIN After a 3 Year Litigation Battle
How did Jenna Hackman and our team bring home a big WIN after 3 years into litigation?
There was no evidence to support their client had notice of an alleged spill. About 3 years into litigation and right before the MSJ hearing, the Plaintiff decided to amend Plaintiff’s Answers to Interrogatories to reflect (for the first time in the record) that 5 years earlier, a phantom employee of our client not only knew how long the substance had been on the floor but that it occurred with regularity. Our Roig team argued the Court should reject the amendment because it was self-serving and not supported anywhere else in the record. The Court agreed!
Contact Jenna Hackman at: